Facesitting

Designed this way to get donations, "erotic content" only available for donors..

My latest pictures with me in wrestilng trunks were initially send to the gallery, probably because they saw that tiny line in front of the bulge as a penis? Or maybe it's because of the bulge (I dunno if that's correct)

I actually sent a message to see if I can change their minds (Because that line is actually from my jockstrap, which I pulled on just because I didn't want to show my penis through the trunks).
It got instantly put into the front-page after that message.

Thank you Legman77, you speak true.

It’s way over the top. I’ve seen more revealing images in a fashion catalog than some of the pictures that get branded sexual in nature on this site.

Legman thank you for taking the time to write and explaining and questioning what many of us have very often wondered about the logic behind degrees of censorship that have been applied .

I love this site. I think that the owner has a brilliant heart. I realize that the photo peer review are delegated to members who volunteer to help monitor what photos are "acceptable" through various judgments to discern what qualifies as gallery worthy for each interest group as well as what is acceptable for profile pictures. It wasn't but a few months ago that pictures that were considered "sexual" such as face to crotch head scissors or school boy pins were color coded as red indicating a mature nature. And just a few months ago those very pictures were removed from the group pictures. I submitted 17 pictures to a new group I started called "headlocks". A week later 2 pictures remained.

I am a heterosexual but consider myself heteroflexible when wrestling. I am not interested in homosexual sex. I am also not frightened by the erotic chemistry that wrestling can evoke in any human. If I had to guess, this site is probably made up of 80%-90% homosexual members and that probably another 10% are not intimidated or concerned about the homoerotic nature of wrestling.

Since being on this site for 3-4 years, many of my profile pictures have been disqualified on the nature of having an erection. I would never display a picture of myself with an erection for a profile picture. I prefer old school singlets from the 70's and 80's. My flacid genitals are visible at times and yet men sporting "Speedos" with erections are often accepted. I have spoken out about such discrepancies and am told that many members pictures were accepted before peer groups were instituted. I don't find this necessarily true. I submitted several videos that took several hours to blur the faces for privacy that were rejected for their "erotic nature". They basically showed face to crotch head scissors. I didn't understand.

What I see is a very homosexual dominated website governed under the auspice that anything remotely erotic or homosexual is shunned. Wrestling in in itself is not sexual but unless we can all admit that aspects of wrestling are and always have been arousing in a sexual nature we are not being honest to the history and nature of this sport. If we eliminated everyone on this site who found an erotic or homosexual element in wrestling, I suspect that maybe 10-15% of the members would remain. So why censor the part that is obviously homoerotic to satisfy the few that are homophobic?

well said Legman77

Well said Legman77, thank you for sharing!